Clinical Evaluation:
An Educational Conference by Edvance MedTech
This conference has been designed for the people actually doing the work. This is a knowledge sharing and learning event first, networking second.
The agenda has been drafted by Richard Holborow (BSI) and refined together with manufacturers and other notified bodies around what you need to know and what is useful in practice - not around what speakers want to present.
The conference covers the whole Life Cycle from a clinical perspective and the focus is on real case reports: where people ran into problems, what worked, what didn’t, and what you should keep in mind when doing the work yourself.
The agenda has been drafted by Richard Holborow (BSI) and refined together with manufacturers and other notified bodies around what you need to know and what is useful in practice - not around what speakers want to present.
The conference covers the whole Life Cycle from a clinical perspective and the focus is on real case reports: where people ran into problems, what worked, what didn’t, and what you should keep in mind when doing the work yourself.
The aim is simple: practical insight from people who have actually been through it.
Master the Medical Device Lifecycle:
a Clinical Affairs Conference
This event has been designed by
Conference Agenda
Day 1 | Tuesday 9 February 2026
10:00 - 10:15 | 15-minute Break
Day 2 | Wednesday 10 February 2026
09:45 - 10:15 | 30-minute Break
10:45 - 11:00 | 15-minute Break
12:15 - 13:15 | Lunch Break
14:30 - 15:00 | 30-minute Break
Get involved
Meet the Conference Chairs
Tom Melvin
Biomedical Alliance Europe, Edvance MedTech Scientific Board
Tom Melvin is Associate Professor of Medical Device Regulatory Science at the University of Galway. Tom is Chair of the Biomedical Alliance Regulatory Affairs Committee and a member of the European Medicines Agency Expert Panels for medical devices, the European Society of Cardiology Regulatory Affairs Committee and the National Research Ethics Committee for Medical Devices.
Tom previously worked at Trinity College Dublin and was a senior medical officer for medical devices at the Health Products Regulatory Authority and Co-Chair of the
MDCG CIE working group.
Tom has been part of Edvance MedTech from the very beginning, contributing invaluable knowledge and insight, while also keeping the founding team grounded and focused when our ideas risked running too wild.
Richard Holborow
Global Head of Clinical Compliance at BSI NotifiedBody (NL) & BSI Approved Body (UK)
Richard Holborow is the Head of Clinical Compliance at BSI. Prior to his role at BSI, Richard worked as a clinical physiologist for 16 years within the National Health Service (NHS) specialising in implantable cardiac devices and electrophysiology. Richard joined BSI in 2018 bringing his clinical expertise and passion for clinical data to the organisation. Richard is also involved with the working groups of the Medical Device Co-ordination Group (MDCG) for the EU.
Yu Jin
MDR Clinical & Regulatory Affairs Expert | Freelance Clinical Reviewer & Clinician providing at Notified Body
Yu Jin is a clinical and regulatory affairs specialist with an MD and PhD in cardiology and cardiovascular epidemiology. With over 15 years of experience across clinical practice, research, the medical device industry, and regulatory sectors, Dr. Jin has developed a comprehensive understanding of both the clinical and scientific aspects of medical device development and evaluation.
Currently a consultant, her career has included leadership roles in clinical and regulatory strategy, particularly in the areas of EU MDR clinical evaluations and clinical investigations. Dr. Jin has extensive expertise in the Notified Body conformity assessment process, including Clinical Evaluation Reports (CER), Post-Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) studies, and clinical investigations.An author of over 50 peer-reviewed scientific publications, Dr. Jin is also recognized for her deep clinical expertise in cardiovascular devices.
Nona Heueis
Clinical Affairs and Life Sciences Expert | Head of Clinical Affairs at Heraeus Medical
Nona Heueis is a microbiologist with a Phd focusing on RNA biology and antibiotic producing bacteria. Leaving academia behind and re-orienting towards industry came easy but scientific focus and love for evidence-based work stayed with her. She accompanied the (mindset) transition into MDR and navigates global strategy for medical devices in orthopedy and trauma with her growing team.
Adam Kleinman
Associate Director, Medical & Scientific Writing at Philips | Medical Device Regulation Expert
Adam Kleinman is the Associate Director of Medical & Scientific Writing at Philips within the Hospital Patient Monitors business. Adam has been leading the team for 3 years and is responsible for clinical evaluations, post-market clinical follow-up, clinical investigation protocols and reports, and scientific publications. Adam has expertise handling clinical evaluations and notified body deficiency reports for devices ranging from class I to III under EU MDR during his time as a consultant at RQM+ and as a senior writer and team lead at Philips.
Pricing
Registration will open September 24th (September 22nd if you pre-registered)
We will have a limited number of Early Bird tickets available at 400 EUR plus VAT for self funded and 500 EUR plus VAT for corporate registration. The total number of Early Bird tickets depend on the sponsorship secured by September 21st.
For advanced access to the Early Bird tickets from September 22nd, please register below.
Self-funded*
500 €
Corporate
750 €
Frequently asked questions
Why do I have to select a track?
To create the best experience for all participants, the conference is organised into two dedicated tracks: Lower & Medium-Risk Devices and High-Risk & Implantable Devices. Due to limited room capacity, participants are asked to select one track when registering.
What if I want to attend sessions from both tracks?
We understand that some sessions in both tracks may be relevant to you. Where possible, sessions will be streamed in a separate room, allowing participants to follow key sessions from the other track as well. However, please note, that this may have limited capacity.
What certificates can I receive?
All participants will automatically receive a Certificate of Attendance after the conference. If you complete a short online knowledge test after the event, you can also receive a Certificate of Completion.
How do I submit a case study?
Please click on “Get involved” on our website or use the case study submission form.
Is there a specific format for case study submissions?
You do not need to prepare a presentation at the application stage. The submission form is designed to give us an understanding of your proposed case, the key insights or challenges, and the value it could bring to the audience.
Do I need to submit my presentation with my application?
No. A presentation is not required at this stage. If you feel that sharing a presentation would provide significantly more insight into your proposed contribution, you are welcome to submit it separately via clinical.conference@edvance-medtech.com. However, polished slides are not a requirement — the content and value of the case are much more important to us than the presentation format.
What is the format of each case presentation?
Each presentation will be 15 minutes in total, consisting of:
- 10 minutes for the presentation
- 5 minutes for questions and discussion
The presentation will be positioned within the context of a Notified Body perspective and an introduction to the overarching topic. Each session will feature three presentations, with the aim of providing complementary insights into the topic.
What makes a good case study?
We are particularly interested in cases that provide genuine learning and practical insights. A challenge, setback or unexpected outcome can be just as-or even more-valuable than a process that went smoothly. We encourage you to consider:
- What can the audience learn from your experience?
- Does the case provide an insight that others can apply to their own work?
- Does it address a challenge that occurs regularly in practice?
- Does it reveal a particular pattern, lesson or approach that others may not have considered?
- Does it complement the other contributions in the session?
Does the case need to be a common or frequently occurring issue?
Not necessarily. Recurring challenges can be particularly valuable because of their practical relevance, but a rare or “corner case” can also be highly valuable if it provides meaningful insight into a specific issue, pattern or lesson.
Do I need to be an experienced presenter?
No. We are not looking primarily for polished presentations or extensive speaking experience. While these can be helpful, our focus is on the quality and relevance of the content. Our aim is to identify real-world insights that participants can take away and apply in their day-to-day work, rather than simply great presentations that leave the audience inspired but without a tangible learning outcome.
How will case studies be selected?
Submissions will be reviewed against several criteria, with particular attention to:
- Learning value: What can the audience take away from the case?
- Relevance and applicability: Can the insight be applied to participants’ day-to-day work?
- Complementarity: Does the case add a new perspective to the other contributions in the session?
- Quality of insight: Does the case reveal a meaningful challenge, lesson, pattern or solution?

